Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/State v. Payne

State v. Payne

910 S.W.2d 318, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1616, 1995 WL 565029
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 26, 1995
DocketNo. 66875
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 910 S.W.2d 318 (State v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Payne, 910 S.W.2d 318, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1616, 1995 WL 565029 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A jury found defendant guilty of first degree murder and armed criminal action under §§ 565.020.1 and 571.015, RSMo 1994. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for new trial finding it had erroneously admitted prejudicial hearsay evidence. State appeals.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ring
86 S.W.3d 481 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)
State v. Carter
78 S.W.3d 786 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
910 S.W.2d 318, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1616, 1995 WL 565029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-payne-moctapp-1995.