State v. Payne

910 S.W.2d 318, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1616, 1995 WL 565029
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 26, 1995·No. No. 66875·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A jury found defendant guilty of first degree murder and armed criminal action under §§ 565.020.1 and 571.015, RSMo 1994. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for new trial finding it had erroneously admitted prejudicial hearsay evidence. State appeals.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Payne, 910 S.W.2d 318, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1616, 1995 WL 565029 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

910 S.W.2d 318 (State v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ring
86 S.W.3d 481 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)
State v. Carter
78 S.W.3d 786 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)