State v. Payne

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Payne

777 A.2d 195, 257 Conn. 904, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 297

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 5, 2001·No. SC 16554·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 583 (AC 20232), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In the exercise of our supervisory authority over the administration of justice, should the defendant be afforded a new trial due to pervasive prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument?”

ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided July 5, 2001

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 583 (AC 20232), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In the exercise of our supervisory authority over the administration of justice, should the defendant be afforded a new trial due to pervasive prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument?”

ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided July 5, 2001

State v. Payne, 777 A.2d 195, 257 Conn. 904, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 297 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

777 A.2d 195 (State v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related