State v. Payne
777 A.2d 195, 257 Conn. 904, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 297
This text of 777 A.2d 195 (State v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Payne, 777 A.2d 195, 257 Conn. 904, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 297 (Colo. 2001).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 583 (AC 20232), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“In the exercise of our supervisory authority over the administration of justice, should the defendant be afforded a new trial due to pervasive prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument?”
ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Payne
901 A.2d 59 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2006)
State v. Payne
797 A.2d 1088 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2002)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
777 A.2d 195, 257 Conn. 904, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-payne-conn-2001.