Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Payne

State v. Payne

673 A.2d 112, 236 Conn. 911, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 90
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 11, 1996
DocketSC 15395
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 673 A.2d 112 (State v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Payne, 673 A.2d 112, 236 Conn. 911, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 90 (Colo. 1996).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 40 Conn. App. 1 (AC 12993), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly hold that General Statutes § 53-21 is violated by conduct posing a risk of injury to a child’s mental health?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly hold that, so construed, General Statutes § 53-21 is not unconstitutionally void for vagueness?

“3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court adequately instructed the jury on the applicability of General Statutes § 53-21 in the circumstances of this case?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Payne
695 A.2d 525 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 A.2d 112, 236 Conn. 911, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-payne-conn-1996.