State v. Payne

673 A.2d 112, 236 Conn. 911, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 90
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 11, 1996·No. SC 15395·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 40 Conn. App. 1 (AC 12993), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly hold that General Statutes § 53-21 is violated by conduct posing a risk of injury to a child’s mental health?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly hold that, so construed, General Statutes § 53-21 is not unconstitutionally void for vagueness?

“3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court adequately instructed the jury on the applicability of General Statutes § 53-21 in the circumstances of this case?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Payne, 673 A.2d 112, 236 Conn. 911, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 90 (Colo. 1996).

673 A.2d 112 (State v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Payne
695 A.2d 525 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)