State v. Paxton
This text of 1996 Ohio 341 (State v. Paxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 1204.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. PAXTON, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Paxton, 1996-Ohio-341.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 95-1340—Submitted September 24, 1996—Decided November 6, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-93-227. __________________ Anthony G. Pizza, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and J. Christopher Anderson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Britz & Zemmelman and Norman G. Zemmelman; and John A. Coble, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, KLINE, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. ROGER L. KLINE, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for RESNICK, J. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1996 Ohio 341, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-paxton-ohio-1996.