State v. Pavich

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 21, 2026·No. SCWC-23-0000334·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 21-JUL-2026 09:34 AM Dkt. 11 OGAC

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

MICHAEL ARLO PAVICH, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 2PC011000015)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Ashford, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Pursuant to this court’s discretion set forth in Hawaiʻi

Revised Statutes (HRS) § 602-59(a), Petitioner Michael Arlo

Pavich’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on May 27,

2026, is accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The

parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding

scheduling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit

supplemental briefing on the following:

1. If waiver does not affect his rights under HRS

chapter 844D, Part XI, is Pavich entitled to a remedy based on the

State’s failure to retain biological evidence under HRS § 844D-

126?

2. What are appropriate remedies for failure to

comply with the requirements under HRS § 844D-126, given the

overall statutory scheme in HRS chapter 844D, Part XI?

Supplemental briefs shall be filed by August 20, 2026,

and shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, July 21, 2026.

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ James H. Ashford

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pavich, (haw 2026).

State v. Pavich (State v. Pavich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 844D-
Hawaii § 844D-
§ 844D-126
Hawaii § 844D-126