State v. Pavich
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 21-JUL-2026 09:34 AM Dkt. 11 OGAC
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
MICHAEL ARLO PAVICH, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 2PC011000015)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Ashford, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Pursuant to this court’s discretion set forth in Hawaiʻi
Revised Statutes (HRS) § 602-59(a), Petitioner Michael Arlo
Pavich’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on May 27,
2026, is accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The
parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding
scheduling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit
supplemental briefing on the following:
1. If waiver does not affect his rights under HRS
chapter 844D, Part XI, is Pavich entitled to a remedy based on the
State’s failure to retain biological evidence under HRS § 844D-
126?
2. What are appropriate remedies for failure to
comply with the requirements under HRS § 844D-126, given the
overall statutory scheme in HRS chapter 844D, Part XI?
Supplemental briefs shall be filed by August 20, 2026,
and shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, July 21, 2026.
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ James H. Ashford
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Pavich (State v. Pavich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.