Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Paulk

State v. Paulk

108 So. 3d 1124, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2413, 2013 WL 557167
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 15, 2013
DocketNo. 5D12-2409
StatusPublished

This text of 108 So. 3d 1124 (State v. Paulk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Paulk, 108 So. 3d 1124, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2413, 2013 WL 557167 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, State of Florida, seeks certio-rari review of an order rendered on June 14, 2012, requiring the State to produce certain materials that the State alleges will result in material harm if disclosed. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we conclude that the order under review departs from the essential requirements of the law and results in material injustice. See State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988). We therefore quash the order under review and remand this case for further proceedings.

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED; REMANDED.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Pettis
520 So. 2d 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 So. 3d 1124, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2413, 2013 WL 557167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-paulk-fladistctapp-2013.