State v. Paul

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Paul

276 S.W.3d 882, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 100, 2009 WL 307506

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 10, 2009

DocketED 90869

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 S.W.3d 882 (State v. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Paul, 276 S.W.3d 882, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 100, 2009 WL 307506 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cynthia Paul appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence, following a bench trial, in which she was found guilty of second-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, armed criminal action, resisting arrest, and third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, and sentenced to a total of five years in prison. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cynthia Paul appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence, following a bench trial, in which she was found guilty of second-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, armed criminal action, resisting arrest, and third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, and sentenced to a total of five years in prison. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 S.W.3d 882, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 100, 2009 WL 307506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-paul-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack