State v. Paul

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Paul

276 S.W.3d 882, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 100, 2009 WL 307506

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 10, 2009·No. ED 90869·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cynthia Paul appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence, following a bench trial, in which she was found guilty of second-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, armed criminal action, resisting arrest, and third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, and sentenced to a total of five years in prison. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cynthia Paul appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence, following a bench trial, in which she was found guilty of second-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, armed criminal action, resisting arrest, and third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, and sentenced to a total of five years in prison. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Paul, 276 S.W.3d 882, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 100, 2009 WL 307506 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

276 S.W.3d 882 (State v. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related