State v. Paul Max Quandt, Jr.
This text of State v. Paul Max Quandt, Jr. (State v. Paul Max Quandt, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE
FILED December 15, 1999
Cecil Crowson, Jr. STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) Appellate Court Clerk ) No. M1998-00446-CCA-R3-CD Appellee, ) ) Franklin County No. 11,712 below v. ) ) ) (Assault) PAUL MAX QUANDT, JR., ) ) AFFIRMED Appellant. )
JUDGMENT
Came the defendant, Paul Max Quandt, Jr., pro se, and the state,
by the Attorney General, and this cause was heard on the record on appeal from
the Circuit Court of Franklin County; and upon consideration thereof, this court is
of the opinion that there is no reversible error in the judgment of the trial court.
It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the trial
court is affirmed and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Franklin
County for the execution of judgment and the collection of costs accrued below.
The costs of the appeal are taxed to the defendant, for which let
execution issue if necessary.
James Curwood W itt, Jr., Judge
Joe G. Riley, Judge
Thomas T. W oodall, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Paul Max Quandt, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-paul-max-quandt-jr-tenncrimapp-1999.