Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Patton

State v. Patton

701 S.E.2d 238, 364 N.C. 130
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 14, 2010
Docket312PA09
StatusPublished

This text of 701 S.E.2d 238 (State v. Patton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Patton, 701 S.E.2d 238, 364 N.C. 130 (N.C. 2010).

Opinion

701 S.E.2d 238 (2010)

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Jason Matthew PATTON.

No. 312PA09.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 14, 2010.

James R. Van Camp, Pinehurst, Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Jason Matthew Patton.

H. Dean Bowman, Patrick Murphy, Special Deputy Attorneys General, for State of NC.

ORDER

The "Defendant's Petition for Writ of Certiorari to Review Order of Richmond County Superior Court" is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the trial court for reconsideration in light of State v. Daniel Easley Defoe (161PA09), 364 N.C. 29, 691 S.E.2d 1.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 14th day of April, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Defoe
691 S.E.2d 1 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 S.E.2d 238, 364 N.C. 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-patton-nc-2010.