State v. Patterson

424 S.W.3d 483, 2014 WL 1016791, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 305
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 18, 2014·No. No. ED 97497·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Patterson (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County after a jury found him guilty of first-degree child molestation. Defendant claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to exclude all evidence of the extrajudicial statements that the victim made to a forensic interviewer because admission of the interviewer’s testimony and a DVD recording of the interview violated Defendant’s right to confront witnesses. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Patterson, 424 S.W.3d 483, 2014 WL 1016791, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 305 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

424 S.W.3d 483 (State v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.