State v. Patterson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Patterson

50 S.W.3d 283, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 804, 2001 WL 505736

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 15, 2001

DocketNo. ED 78629

StatusPublished

This text of 50 S.W.3d 283 (State v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Patterson, 50 S.W.3d 283, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 804, 2001 WL 505736 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alonzo Patterson (Appellant) appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction of sale of a controlled substance, a Class B felony in violation of Section 195.211.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are supported by substantial evidence. State v. Giffin, 640 S.W.2d 128, 130 (Mo.banc 1982). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alonzo Patterson (Appellant) appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction of sale of a controlled substance, a Class B felony in violation of Section 195.211.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are supported by substantial evidence. State v. Giffin, 640 S.W.2d 128, 130 (Mo.banc 1982). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 S.W.3d 283, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 804, 2001 WL 505736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-patterson-moctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack