State v. Patterson

50 S.W.3d 283, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 804, 2001 WL 505736
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 15, 2001·No. No. ED 78629·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alonzo Patterson (Appellant) appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction of sale of a controlled substance, a Class B felony in violation of Section 195.211.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are supported by substantial evidence. State v. Giffin, 640 S.W.2d 128, 130 (Mo.banc 1982). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Patterson, 50 S.W.3d 283, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 804, 2001 WL 505736 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

50 S.W.3d 283 (State v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Giffin
640 S.W.2d 128 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1982)