State v. Patterson
This text of 29 A.3d 467 (State v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Sharon PATTERSON.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mary Beattie Shairer, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.
Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
*468 The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn.App. 65, 27 A.3d 374, is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the state presented sufficient evidence that the defendant had the required mental state in order to convict her under General Statutes § 53a-58(a)?
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the state presented sufficient evidence that the defendant had the required mental state in order to convict her under General Statutes § 53-20(a)(1) and (b)(1)?
"3. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the state presented sufficient evidence that the defendant had the required mental state to convict her under General Statutes § 53-21(a)(1)?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A.3d 467, 302 Conn. 942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-patterson-conn-2011.