State v. Patsas

60 So. 3d 1152, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6762, 2011 WL 1810606
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 13, 2011
DocketNo. 5D10-2844
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 60 So. 3d 1152 (State v. Patsas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Patsas, 60 So. 3d 1152, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6762, 2011 WL 1810606 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s sua sponte order dismissing a 1985 felony charge filed against Anastasios Patsas. The record reflects that the State did not receive notice or an opportunity to be heard prior to the rendition of the order of dismissal. The fundamental requisites of due process of law are notice and the opportunity to be heard. See, e.g., Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314, 70 S.Ct. 652, 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950).

ORDER OF DISMISSAL QUASHED.

SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jane Doe v. James Uthmeier, Attorney General
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
City of Miami Beach v. Adalberto Cosme
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 So. 3d 1152, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6762, 2011 WL 1810606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-patsas-fladistctapp-2011.