State v. . Patrick

51 N.C. 308
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 51 N.C. 308 (State v. . Patrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Patrick, 51 N.C. 308 (N.C. 1859).

Opinion

Battle, J.

It is clearly settled that it is evidence in favor of a negro, in a suit for his freedom, that he is generally reputed to be free, and has always acted and passed as a free man. See Jarman v. Humphrey, ante 28, and Brookfield v. Stanton, ante 156. If such evidence be admissible to establish the fact of a negro’s being free, when it is to operate in his favor, *309 it seems to us, that it must equally be so when it is to' operate against him.

That a man’s color may be proved to show that he is a negro, is a proposition too plain to admit of a doubt. State v. Chavers, 5 Jones’ Rep. 11.

Peb Curiam, Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Miller
29 S.E.2d 751 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
Cole v. District Board of School Dist. No. 29
1912 OK 289 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Hopkins v. . Bowers
16 S.E. 1 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 N.C. 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-patrick-nc-1859.