State v. Patino

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Patino

534 S.W.3d 925

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 19, 2017

DocketWD 80013

StatusPublished

This text of 534 S.W.3d 925 (State v. Patino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Patino, 534 S.W.3d 925 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Jesse Patino appeals his conviction for felony child endangerment. He contends there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Jesse Patino appeals his conviction for felony child endangerment. He contends there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 S.W.3d 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-patino-moctapp-2017.