State v. Patino

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Patino

534 S.W.3d 925

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 19, 2017·No. WD 80013·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Jesse Patino appeals his conviction for felony child endangerment. He contends there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Jesse Patino appeals his conviction for felony child endangerment. He contends there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

State v. Patino, 534 S.W.3d 925 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

534 S.W.3d 925 (State v. Patino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.