State v. Pate

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Pate

308 S.E.2d 326, 309 N.C. 630, 1983 N.C. LEXIS 1448

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 3, 1983

Docket263A83

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 308 S.E.2d 326 (State v. Pate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Pate, 308 S.E.2d 326, 309 N.C. 630, 1983 N.C. LEXIS 1448 (N.C. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant presents only one issue for review — whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the issue of self-defense. We have carefully reviewed the opinion of the Court of Appeals, the record on appeal, and the briefs and authorities relating to defendant’s contentions. We conclude that the result reached by the majority below, its reasoning, and the legal principles enunciated by it are correct.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant presents only one issue for review — whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the issue of self-defense. We have carefully reviewed the opinion of the Court of Appeals, the record on appeal, and the briefs and authorities relating to defendant’s contentions. We conclude that the result reached by the majority below, its reasoning, and the legal principles enunciated by it are correct.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

308 S.E.2d 326, 309 N.C. 630, 1983 N.C. LEXIS 1448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pate-nc-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack