State v. Pate
308 S.E.2d 326, 309 N.C. 630, 1983 N.C. LEXIS 1448
Opinion
Defendant presents only one issue for review — whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the issue of self-defense. We have carefully reviewed the opinion of the Court of Appeals, the record on appeal, and the briefs and authorities relating to defendant’s contentions. We conclude that the result reached by the majority below, its reasoning, and the legal principles enunciated by it are correct.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Pate, 308 S.E.2d 326, 309 N.C. 630, 1983 N.C. LEXIS 1448 (N.C. 1983).
308 S.E.2d 326 (State v. Pate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hughes
348 S.E.2d 147 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1986)