State v. Paschall

328 Or. App. 788
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 25, 2023
DocketA177795
StatusUnpublished

This text of 328 Or. App. 788 (State v. Paschall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Paschall, 328 Or. App. 788 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1). Submitted October 3, affirmed October 25, 2023, petition for review denied February 15, 2024 (372 Or 63)

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER BRANDON PASCHALL, Defendant-Appellant. Lincoln County Circuit Court 20CR44696; A177795

Sheryl Bachart, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Marc Brown, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Robert A. Koch, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, and Mooney, Judge, and Pagán, Judge. PER CURIAM Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. Inc., 556 US 868, 129 S Ct 2252, 173 L Ed 2d 1208 (2009); State v. Langley, 363 Or 482, 424 P3d 688 (2018), adh’d to as modified on recons, 365 Or 418, 446 P3d 542 (2019), cert den, ___ US ___, 141 S Ct 138 (2020). Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.
556 U.S. 868 (Supreme Court, 2009)
State v. Langley
424 P.3d 688 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2018)
State v. Langley
446 P.3d 542 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
328 Or. App. 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-paschall-orctapp-2023.