State v. Parvis

502 So. 2d 1245, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 63, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2753
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 5, 1987·No. No. 68849·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review State v. Parvis, 487 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1986), in which the district court certified the following question also certified in McKnight v. Bloom, 490 So.2d 92 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1986) as one of great public importance:

Whether Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(i)(4) is applicable to a criminal case wherein the defendant is taken into custody prior to January 1, 1985, 12:01 A.M., the effective date of the above-stated rule.

Parvis, 487 So.2d at 1181. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

The Third District Court of Appeal sitting en banc in Zabrani v. Cowart, 502 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1986), recently overruled its decisions in McKnight and Par-vis. Adopting the court’s reasoning in Zabrani, we answered the certified question in the affirmative in Bloom v. McKnight, No. 68,401 (Fla. Jan. 5, 1987). Accordingly, we once again answer the question in the affirmative and quash the decision below.

It is so ordered.

MCDONALD, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Parvis, 502 So. 2d 1245, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 63, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2753 (Fla. 1987).

502 So. 2d 1245 (State v. Parvis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zabrani v. Cowart
502 So. 2d 1257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
McKnight v. Bloom
490 So. 2d 92 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
State v. Parvis
487 So. 2d 1181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)