State v. Parsons

129 N.E.2d 60, 234 Ind. 708, 1955 Ind. LEXIS 197
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided October 4, 1955·No. No. 0-410·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

Under the above entitled caption one Joe Parsons, pro se, an inmate of the Indiana State Prison, has presented to this court a “Second Filing” of a paper which he styles an “Appeal to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana,” and in which he seeks to obtain some kind of a mandate against the Randolph Circuit Court. The paper petitioner filed is not verified and he has not furnished a form of the writ which he deems himself entitled to as required by Rule 2-35 of this court.

All of the files and papers in the causes entitled The State of Indiana v. Joe Parsons, No. 0-388 (Ind. 1955), 124 N. E. 2d 210, and Joe Parsons v. Randolph Circuit Court, No. 0-392 (Ind. 1955), 126 N. E. 2d 769, have been examined and it appears that substantially the same issues and matters were considered by this court in those opinions as are presented herein.

In view of petitioner’s failure to comply with Rule 2-35 of this court governing original actions for writs of mandate, the petition is denied.

Note.—Reported in 129 N. E. 2d 60.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Parsons, 129 N.E.2d 60, 234 Ind. 708, 1955 Ind. LEXIS 197 (Ind. 1955).

129 N.E.2d 60 (State v. Parsons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pittman v. Elsbury
220 N.E.2d 611 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1966)
Rhodes v. Shirley
129 N.E.2d 60 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1955)