State v. Parslow

Connecticut Appellate Court

State v. Parslow

759 A.2d 1055, 60 Conn. App. 533, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 497

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedOctober 24, 2000

DocketAC 19523

StatusPublished

This text of 759 A.2d 1055 (State v. Parslow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Parslow, 759 A.2d 1055, 60 Conn. App. 533, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 497 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Jacqueline Agnes Par-slow, appeals from the judgment of conviction of reckless endangerment in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-64 and criminal mischief in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-117. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied her motion for judgment of acquittal because there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict.

We have fully reviewed and considered the record and the parties’ briefs. The appeal rests on fact-bound [534]*534issues. The verdict of the jury is supported by the evidence and the inferences that reasonably may be drawn therefrom. See State v. Miller, 59 Conn. App. 406, 412, 757 A.2d 69 (2000). Having applied the appropriate standard of review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI