State v. Parshall
615 P.2d 402, 47 Or. App. 807, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3587
Opinion
The state concedes that a condition of. defendant’s probation, viz., that he submit to chemical analysis of his breath, blood or urine upon the request of any law enforcement officer, physician or other person licensed to analyze human blood, breath or urine, is overbroad. See State v. McGivney, 36 Or App 885, 585 P2d 767 (1978). The case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Parshall, 615 P.2d 402, 47 Or. App. 807, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3587 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).
615 P.2d 402 (State v. Parshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. McGivney
585 P.2d 767 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1978)