State v. Parshall

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Parshall

615 P.2d 402, 47 Or. App. 807, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3587

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 18, 1980

DocketNo. 10-79-07199, CA 15670

StatusPublished

This text of 615 P.2d 402 (State v. Parshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Parshall, 615 P.2d 402, 47 Or. App. 807, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3587 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The state concedes that a condition of. defendant’s probation, viz., that he submit to chemical analysis of his breath, blood or urine upon the request of any law enforcement officer, physician or other person licensed to analyze human blood, breath or urine, is overbroad. See State v. McGivney, 36 Or App 885, 585 P2d 767 (1978). The case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The state concedes that a condition of. defendant’s probation, viz., that he submit to chemical analysis of his breath, blood or urine upon the request of any law enforcement officer, physician or other person licensed to analyze human blood, breath or urine, is overbroad. See State v. McGivney, 36 Or App 885, 585 P2d 767 (1978). The case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

615 P.2d 402, 47 Or. App. 807, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-parshall-orctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack