State v. Parrott

194 S.E.2d 162, 17 N.C. App. 332, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1351
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 31, 1973
DocketNo. 7315SC187
StatusPublished

This text of 194 S.E.2d 162 (State v. Parrott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Parrott, 194 S.E.2d 162, 17 N.C. App. 332, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1351 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

PARKER, Judge.

Defendant having pled guilty, the sole question presented is whether error appears on the face of the record proper. State v. Roberts, 279 N.C. 500, 183 S.E. 2d 647. We have carefully examined the record, and no error appears. The judgment of the superior court is

Affirmed.

Judges Britt and Vaughn concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Roberts
183 S.E.2d 647 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 S.E.2d 162, 17 N.C. App. 332, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-parrott-ncctapp-1973.