State v. Parrish

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Parrish

72 P.3d 1066, 188 Or. App. 663, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 899

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 16, 2003

Docket02C17956; A119494

StatusPublished

This text of 72 P.3d 1066 (State v. Parrish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Parrish, 72 P.3d 1066, 188 Or. App. 663, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 899 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals his involuntary civil commitment on the ground that there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion that he is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(1)(d)(B). The state concedes that the evidence in the record is insufficient to meet the requisite “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard. ORS 426.130. Having reviewed the record, we conclude that the state’s concession is well founded and accept it.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals his involuntary civil commitment on the ground that there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion that he is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(1)(d)(B). The state concedes that the evidence in the record is insufficient to meet the requisite “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard. ORS 426.130. Having reviewed the record, we conclude that the state’s concession is well founded and accept it.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 P.3d 1066, 188 Or. App. 663, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-parrish-orctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack