State v. Parmenter

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Parmenter

115 P.2d 620, 111 Mont. 620, 1941 Mont. LEXIS 35

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 8, 1941

DocketNo. 8,173.

StatusPublished

This text of 115 P.2d 620 (State v. Parmenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Parmenter, 115 P.2d 620, 111 Mont. 620, 1941 Mont. LEXIS 35 (Mo. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this action the verified application of appellant, convicted of the crime of embezzlement in the district court of Ravalli county, for a certificate of probable cause and *621 for an order admitting appellant to bail, discloses that like applications were made to and refused by the trial court. On consideration of the record on appeal, it is the opinion of the Justices of this court that there is probable cause for the appeal within the contemplation of section 12113, Revised Codes, and the rules of this court. It is ordered that a certificate of probable cause issue, and that defendant be admitted to bail upon furnishing an undertaking in such sum as the trial court may determine.

Mr. J. D. Taylor, Mr. Wellington D. Rankin and Mr. Arthur P. Acher, for Petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this action the verified application of appellant, convicted of the crime of embezzlement in the district court of Ravalli county, for a certificate of probable cause and *621 for an order admitting appellant to bail, discloses that like applications were made to and refused by the trial court. On consideration of the record on appeal, it is the opinion of the Justices of this court that there is probable cause for the appeal within the contemplation of section 12113, Revised Codes, and the rules of this court. It is ordered that a certificate of probable cause issue, and that defendant be admitted to bail upon furnishing an undertaking in such sum as the trial court may determine.

Mr. J. D. Taylor, Mr. Wellington D. Rankin and Mr. Arthur P. Acher, for Petitioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 P.2d 620, 111 Mont. 620, 1941 Mont. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-parmenter-mont-1941.