Home/New York Court of General Session of the Peace/State v. Parm & Viney

State v. Parm & Viney

60 A. 977, 21 Del. 556, 5 Penne. 556, 1905 Del. LEXIS 57
CourtNew York Court of General Session of the Peace
DecidedFebruary 9, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 60 A. 977 (State v. Parm & Viney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of General Session of the Peace primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Parm & Viney, 60 A. 977, 21 Del. 556, 5 Penne. 556, 1905 Del. LEXIS 57 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1905).

Opinion

Lore, C. J.:

—The Court have thoroughly looked into the matter of the motion made this morning to quash the third count • of the indictment against John Farm and John Viney, and we think the word “person ” means other than the woman to be operated upon for the purprse of producing an abortion; that the person advising or counseling, or whatever it may be, the woman herself, is provided for in the earlier part of section 2; that the word “ counsel ” does not apply to persons giving her advice; and that therefore this count is bad, and ought to be, and is quashed and stricken out.

Nolle prosequi entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. State
113 A.2d 880 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1955)
State v. Henry
105 A. 849 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A. 977, 21 Del. 556, 5 Penne. 556, 1905 Del. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-parm-viney-nygensess-1905.