State v. Parks

2018 ND 104, 910 N.W.2d 845
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 2018·No. 20170462·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Scott Parks appealed after conditionally pleading guilty to charges of possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Parks argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a purported illegal stop of his vehicle, contending the stop was not supported by reasonable and articulable suspicion. We summarily affirm the amended criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). See City of West Fargo v. Ross , 2001 ND 163 , 634 N.W.2d 527 .

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Parks, 2018 ND 104, 910 N.W.2d 845 (N.D. 2018).

2018 ND 104 (State v. Parks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of West Fargo v. Ross
2001 ND 163 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2001)