State v. Parks

533 A.2d 1288, 1987 Me. LEXIS 859
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedNovember 30, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 533 A.2d 1288 (State v. Parks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Parks, 533 A.2d 1288, 1987 Me. LEXIS 859 (Me. 1987).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Larry Parks appeals his convictions entered after a jury trial in Superior Court, Cumberland County, of kidnapping, gross sexual misconduct, unlawful sexual contact, burglary and theft in violation of, respectively, 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 301(1)(A)(3), 253, 255(1), 401 and 353 (1983 & Supp. 1987). Parks contends that the in-court identification by a witness was tainted by an inadvertent out-of-court confrontation. We conclude that the Superior Court ruled correctly that a chance encounter of the defendant and the witness was not unduly suggestive and properly refused to suppress the witness’s in-court identification. See State v. Reeves, 499 A.2d 130, 136-37 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Reeves
499 A.2d 130 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
533 A.2d 1288, 1987 Me. LEXIS 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-parks-me-1987.