State v. Parker, No. Cr94-394926 (Jun. 8, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 7247, 14 Conn. L. Rptr. 574
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJune 8, 1995
DocketNo. CR94-394926
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 7247 (State v. Parker, No. Cr94-394926 (Jun. 8, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Parker, No. Cr94-394926 (Jun. 8, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 7247, 14 Conn. L. Rptr. 574 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss claiming that Connecticut General Statutes § 53-237a is unconstitutionally vague.

Acknowledging the existence of the principle that a court must indulge in every presumption in favor of a statute's constitutionality, this court cannot overlook the fact that this statute was first passed in 1806 long before Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) and was last amended in 1971, two years prior to Roe v.Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

After reviewing Roe v. Wade, this court finds Connecticut General Statutes § 53-237a void as vague and overbroadly infringing on the defendant's Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Accordingly, the defendant's Motion to Dismiss is granted.

Richard A. Damiani, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roe v. Wade
410 U.S. 113 (Supreme Court, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 7247, 14 Conn. L. Rptr. 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-parker-no-cr94-394926-jun-8-1995-connsuperct-1995.