State v. Parker

891 S.W.2d 899, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 227, 1995 WL 44720
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Parker. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1850
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 7, 1995·No. No. 65777·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Parker (“Defendant”) was convicted by a jury of first degree assault, § 565.050 RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015 RSMo 1986. Defendant was sentenced to consecutive terms of ten years and three years, respectively. In his appeal, Defendant contends that the tidal court erred in sustaining the prosecution’s hearsay objection to testimony offered by two witnesses for the defense. We disagree. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Parker, 891 S.W.2d 899, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 227, 1995 WL 44720 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

891 S.W.2d 899 (State v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.