State v. Parker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Parker

543 N.W.2d 93, 1996 WL 50916

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided February 5, 1996·No. No. C4-95-426·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals filed September 26, 1995, affirming the conviction of Rodney Y. Parker of driving while under the influence of alcohol within 5 years of a prior impaired-driving conviction be, and the same is, affirmed. Parker contends that the revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to the implied consent law barred the subsequent criminal prosecution under the double jeopardy clause. This contention is answered by our decision in State v. Hanson, 543 N.W.2d [94]*9484 (Minn.1996). The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alexander M. Keith A.M. KEITH Chief Justice

PAGE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals filed September 26, 1995, affirming the conviction of Rodney Y. Parker of driving while under the influence of alcohol within 5 years of a prior impaired-driving conviction be, and the same is, affirmed. Parker contends that the revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to the implied consent law barred the subsequent criminal prosecution under the double jeopardy clause. This contention is answered by our decision in State v. Hanson, 543 N.W.2d [94]*9484 (Minn.1996). The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alexander M. Keith A.M. KEITH Chief Justice

PAGE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

State v. Parker, 543 N.W.2d 93, 1996 WL 50916 (Mich. 1996).

Pincite

543 N.W.2d 93 (State v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related