State v. Parker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Parker

543 N.W.2d 93, 1996 WL 50916

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedFebruary 5, 1996

DocketNo. C4-95-426

StatusPublished

This text of 543 N.W.2d 93 (State v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Parker, 543 N.W.2d 93, 1996 WL 50916 (Mich. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals filed September 26, 1995, affirming the conviction of Rodney Y. Parker of driving while under the influence of alcohol within 5 years of a prior impaired-driving conviction be, and the same is, affirmed. Parker contends that the revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to the implied consent law barred the subsequent criminal prosecution under the double jeopardy clause. This contention is answered by our decision in State v. Hanson, 543 N.W.2d [94]*9484 (Minn.1996). The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alexander M. Keith A.M. KEITH Chief Justice

PAGE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals filed September 26, 1995, affirming the conviction of Rodney Y. Parker of driving while under the influence of alcohol within 5 years of a prior impaired-driving conviction be, and the same is, affirmed. Parker contends that the revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to the implied consent law barred the subsequent criminal prosecution under the double jeopardy clause. This contention is answered by our decision in State v. Hanson, 543 N.W.2d [94]*9484 (Minn.1996). The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alexander M. Keith A.M. KEITH Chief Justice

PAGE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

543 N.W.2d 93, 1996 WL 50916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-parker-minn-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack