State v. Parker

Supreme Court of Alabama

State v. Parker

840 So. 2d 131, 2002 Ala. LEXIS 186, 2002 WL 1302529

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 14, 2002

Docket1000848

StatusPublished

This text of 840 So. 2d 131 (State v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Parker, 840 So. 2d 131, 2002 Ala. LEXIS 186, 2002 WL 1302529 (Ala. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

WOODALL, Justice.

Pursuant to Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P., this Court granted the State of Alabama, the defendant in this action, and certain inter-venors permission to appeal from the trial court’s interlocutory order entered on January 24, 2001, denying the State’s motion for a summary judgment. We reverse the trial court’s order and remand the action.

It is undisputed that this is, in part, a direct action against the State for a refund of sales taxes. The trial court has no subject-matter jurisdiction over a direct action against the State for a tax refund. See Patterson v. Gladwin Corp., 835 So.2d 137 (Ala.2002). Therefore, to the extent the trial court failed to dismiss the plaintiffs’ direct claims for sales-tax refunds, it erred, and its order must be reversed.

The trial court’s order entered on January 24, 2001, is reversed, and this action is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Patterson and this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON, LYONS, and JOHNSTONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI