State v. Paradiso
This text of 335 Or. App. 372 (State v. Paradiso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
372 October 2, 2024 No. 708
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CHESTER BRENT PARADISO, aka Bretn Chester Paradiso, aka Brent Chester Paradiso, Defendant-Appellant. Umatilla County Circuit Court 21CR31664; A180573
Daniel J. Hill, Judge. Submitted September 5, 2024. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Bruce A. Myers, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Peenesh Shah, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Aoyagi, Presiding Judge, Egan, Judge, and Joyce, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Straub, 322 Or App 393, 520 P3d 915 (2022), rev den, 370 Or 827 (2023).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
335 Or. App. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-paradiso-orctapp-2024.