State v. Papciak

39 A.2d 188, 93 N.H. 233, 1944 N.H. LEXIS 133
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedOctober 3, 1944
DocketNo. 3487.
StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.2d 188 (State v. Papciak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Papciak, 39 A.2d 188, 93 N.H. 233, 1944 N.H. LEXIS 133 (N.H. 1944).

Opinion

Marble, C. J.

If the defendant failed to support her illegitimate child, as charged in the indictment, she is guilty of a violation of section 2 of chapter 441 of the Revised Laws. This section is as follows: “Any person who shall, without lawful excuse, desert or willfully neglect or refuse to provide for the support and maintenance of his or her legitimate or illegitimate minor child under the age of sixteen years in destitute or necessitous circumstances shall be fined not more than three hundred dollars, or imprisoned not more than fifteen months, or both.”

The case of State v. Byron, 79 N. H. 39, on which the defendant relies, merely holds that the alleged father of an illegitimate child is not liable to indictment under the statute in question if he has not been adjudged chargeable in bastardy proceedings (R. L., c. 128).

Case discharged.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Byron
104 A. 401 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 A.2d 188, 93 N.H. 233, 1944 N.H. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-papciak-nh-1944.