State v. Paola
704 P.2d 550, 75 Or. App. 128, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3830
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 28, 1985·No. 43554 S; CA A34777·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction, after trial to the court, for driving under the influence of intoxicants. He contends that he did not effectively waive his constitutional and statutory rights to a jury trial. The state concedes that no written jury trial waiver was executed and that the judgment must be reversed. State v. Van Lieu, 48 Or App 671, 617 P2d 914 (1980); State v. Wiik, 31 Or App 571, 570 P2d 1021 (1977), rev den 281 Or 323 (1978).
Reversed and remanded for new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Paola, 704 P.2d 550, 75 Or. App. 128, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3830 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).
704 P.2d 550 (State v. Paola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
LaMarche v. State of Oregon
725 P.2d 378 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)