State v. Panella
This text of 329 A.2d 135 (State v. Panella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing that the state has failed to defend with proper diligence against the defendant’s appeal, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that, unless the state files its brief on or before February 3, 1975, the judgment of the Superior Court in New Haven County finding the defendant guilty as charged is set aside and the case is remanded thereto with direction to render judgment that the defendant is not guilty and to order that he be discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
329 A.2d 135, 167 Conn. 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-panella-conn-1974.