Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Panek

State v. Panek

149 A.3d 980, 323 Conn. 911, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 285
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 20, 2016
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 149 A.3d 980 (State v. Panek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Panek, 149 A.3d 980, 323 Conn. 911, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 285 (Colo. 2016).

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn. App. 613, 145 A.3d 924 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly construe the 'not in plain view' element of General Statutes § 53a-189a, the video voyeurism statute, in affirming the dismissal of charges against the defendant?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Panek
177 A.3d 1113 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 A.3d 980, 323 Conn. 911, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-panek-conn-2016.