State v. Panek
149 A.3d 980, 323 Conn. 911, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 285
Opinion
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,
"Did the Appellate Court properly construe the 'not in plain view' element of General Statutes § 53a-189a, the video voyeurism statute, in affirming the dismissal of charges against the defendant?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Panek, 149 A.3d 980, 323 Conn. 911, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 285 (Colo. 2016).
149 A.3d 980 (State v. Panek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Panek
177 A.3d 1113 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2018)