State v. Pampkin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Pampkin

411 S.W.3d 869, 2013 WL 5744433, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1235

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 2013·No. No. ED 98512·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jimmie Pampkin (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of first-degree robbery, first-degree assault, and armed criminal action.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jimmie Pampkin (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of first-degree robbery, first-degree assault, and armed criminal action.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Pampkin, 411 S.W.3d 869, 2013 WL 5744433, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1235 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

411 S.W.3d 869 (State v. Pampkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.