State v. Palmer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Palmer

591 P.2d 426, 39 Or. App. 207, 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 2560

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 12, 1979

DocketNo. T-8947G, CA 12087

StatusPublished

This text of 591 P.2d 426 (State v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Palmer, 591 P.2d 426, 39 Or. App. 207, 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 2560 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Rule 5.11 of the Rules for Appeals from District Courts, Or Adv Sh, Vol. 76, No. 40 (January 1,1977), provides:¹

"Briefs, in referring to evidence, shall make appropriate reference to the location of the evidence. In the case of audio records, the references shall set out the particular tape number, cue number and numerical counter reading in this form: A. R. Tape No. _, Cue No. _, at _ [numerical counter location]. * * * ”

Appellant’s brief does not comply with this rule.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Rule 5.11 of the Rules for Appeals from District Courts, Or Adv Sh, Vol. 76, No. 40 (January 1,1977), provides:¹

"Briefs, in referring to evidence, shall make appropriate reference to the location of the evidence. In the case of audio records, the references shall set out the particular tape number, cue number and numerical counter reading in this form: A. R. Tape No. _, Cue No. _, at _ [numerical counter location]. * * * ”

Appellant’s brief does not comply with this rule.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

591 P.2d 426, 39 Or. App. 207, 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 2560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-palmer-orctapp-1979.