State v. Palmer

672 N.E.2d 176, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1452, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 4070
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 21, 1996
Docket96-2301
StatusPublished

This text of 672 N.E.2d 176 (State v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Palmer, 672 N.E.2d 176, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1452, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 4070 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

Belmont App. No. 89-B-28. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Belmont County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of proceedings in this court,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay of proceedings in this court be, and hereby is, denied.

. Cook, J., would deny the stay and would appoint new counsel and grant forty days to file from the date of the appointment. Pfeifer, J., would appoint the Public Defender. Moyer, C.J., dissents and would grant the stay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
672 N.E.2d 176, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1452, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 4070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-palmer-ohio-1996.