Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Palma

State v. Palma

823 P.2d 1040, 111 Or. App. 388, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 379
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 12, 1992
Docket9006-33564; CA A68629; 9006-33851; CA A68630
StatusPublished

This text of 823 P.2d 1040 (State v. Palma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Palma, 823 P.2d 1040, 111 Or. App. 388, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 379 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted, after trial to the court, of delivery of controlled substances. ORS 475.992. The indictments included allegations that delivery occurred as part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network. Defendant challenges only his sentence, and the state concedes that the sentence was improper and that the case should be remanded for resentencing. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991). We accept that concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Moeller
806 P.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
State v. Moeller
815 P.2d 701 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
823 P.2d 1040, 111 Or. App. 388, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-palma-orctapp-1992.