State v. Pair

775 P.2d 932, 97 Or. App. 523, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 833
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 12, 1989
DocketM 88-104; CA A48868
StatusPublished

This text of 775 P.2d 932 (State v. Pair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pair, 775 P.2d 932, 97 Or. App. 523, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 833 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is an appeal from a commitment order. ORS 426.005 et seq. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in determining that he is mentally ill under ORS 426.005(2)1 and in relying on facts not in evidence, including a precommitment investigation report that was made part of the record without being introduced in evidence. On de novo review, we conclude that, even if we, as well as the trial court, could properly consider the investigation report, which we need not decide, there is insufficient evidence that appellant is mentally ill within the meaning of ORS 426.005(2).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
775 P.2d 932, 97 Or. App. 523, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pair-orctapp-1989.