State v. Pair

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Pair

310 S.W.3d 303, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 606, 2010 WL 1860793

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 11, 2010

DocketED 93241

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 310 S.W.3d 303 (State v. Pair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Pair, 310 S.W.3d 303, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 606, 2010 WL 1860793 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Ray Pair appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of driving while intoxicated and driving while license revoked. We find that the trial court did not err in denying Pair’s motion for judgment of acquittal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Ray Pair appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of driving while intoxicated and driving while license revoked. We find that the trial court did not err in denying Pair’s motion for judgment of acquittal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

310 S.W.3d 303, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 606, 2010 WL 1860793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pair-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack