State v. Paige

649 P.2d 569, 293 Or. 453, 1982 Ore. LEXIS 979
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided August 3, 1982·No. TC 10-80-07972, CA A20052, SC 28433·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was indicted under ORS 163.275(1)(e), which defines one form of the crime of “coercion.” The trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to the indictment on constitutional grounds, and the state appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed, 55 Or App 519, 638 P2d 1173 (1981).

Having previously allowed review in the companion cases State v. Robertson and State v. Young, we held defendant’s petition for review in abeyance pending decision in those cases. Today we sustain the defendants’ constitutional claim in Robertson and Young and remand those cases to the circuit court for entry of judgment on the order allowing the demurrers. State v. Robertson/Young, 293 Or 402, 649 P2d 569 (1982). Accordingly, we now allow this defendant’s petition for review, reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals, and similarly remand this case for entry of judgment on the order allowing defendant’s demurrer.

Reversed and remanded to the circuit court for entry of judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Paige, 649 P.2d 569, 293 Or. 453, 1982 Ore. LEXIS 979 (Or. 1982).

649 P.2d 569 (State v. Paige) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Pedersen
255 P.3d 556 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
State v. Bruce Lincoln Butterfield
874 P.2d 1339 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)