State v. Pai

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided April 11, 2013·No. SCWC-11-0000344·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000344 11-APR-2013

SCWC-11-0000344 11:42 AM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

ROGER A. PAI,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000344; 2DTC-10-003203)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Roger A. Pai’s application for writ of certiorari, filed March 8, 2013, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 11, 2013.

James S. Tabe /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for the petitioner /s/ Paula S. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pai, (haw 2013).

State v. Pai (State v. Pai) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.