State v. Pai
This text of State v. Pai (State v. Pai) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30516 21-OCT-2011 09:24 AM SCWC-30516
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
STATE OF HAWAI#I , Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
LAWRENCE PAI, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30516; CASE NO. 1DTA-10-00706)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Lawrence Pai’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on September 12, 2011, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 21, 2011. Timothy MacMaster for /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner/defendant- /s/ Paula A. Nakayama appellant on the /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. application /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Pai, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pai-haw-2011.