State v. . Page
This text of 7 S.E.2d 559 (State v. . Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the December Term, 1939, Johnston Superior Court, the defendant herein, Zeb Page, was tried upon indictment charging him with rape, which resulted in a conviction of the capital offense, and sentence of death as the law commands on such verdicts.
From the judgment thus entered, the defendant gave notice of appeal and was allowed to prosecute same in forma pauperis. The clerk certifies that nothing has been done towards perfecting the appeal and that the time for filing it has expired. He further states in his certificate that he is informed by counsel they do not intend to prosecute the appeal. S. v. Stovall, 214 N. C., 695, 200 S. E., 426.
In the absence of any apparent error, which the record now before us fails to disclose, the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss under Rule 17 will be allowed. S. v. Moore, 216 N. C., 543.
Judgment affirmed. Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 S.E.2d 559, 217 N.C. 288, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-page-nc-1940.