State v. . Page

21 S.E. 401, 116 N.C. 1016
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Faikcloth, C. J.:

The defendants made no exception to the admission of evidence nor to His Honor’s charge. After verdict and rule for new trial discharged, the case states that “ defendants excepted,” but does not specify anything to which the defendants excepted. We have examined the record and find no error thérein.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Page, 21 S.E. 401, 116 N.C. 1016 (N.C. 1895).

21 S.E. 401 (State v. . Page) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burnett v. Wilmington, Newbern & Norfolk Railway Co.
26 S.E. 819 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)