Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Padron

State v. Padron

519 So. 2d 1144, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 479, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 644, 1988 WL 10218
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 16, 1988
DocketNo. 87-516
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 519 So. 2d 1144 (State v. Padron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Padron, 519 So. 2d 1144, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 479, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 644, 1988 WL 10218 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The trial court dismissed the charges against Padrón based on the state’s failure to disclose the identity of the confidential informant. The court found that defendant may have been prejudiced in his ability to present his asserted defense of entrap[1145]*1145ment. We remand the cause for further proceedings to enable the trial court to determine whether the state’s conduct falls within the ruling of Aldazabal v. State, 471 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Reversed and remanded.

HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gonzalez
528 So. 2d 1297 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 So. 2d 1144, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 479, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 644, 1988 WL 10218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-padron-fladistctapp-1988.