State v. Pace
This text of 346 Or. App. 880 (State v. Pace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
880 February 4, 2026 No. 74
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOSEPH WILLIAM PACE, aka Joseph W. Pace, Defendant-Appellant. Coos County Circuit Court 23CR63339; A184533
Andrew E. Combs, Judge. Argued and submitted December 19, 2025. Erik Blumenthal, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. Also on the briefs was Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Oregon Public Defense Commission. Carson L. Whitehead, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Dan Rayfield, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General. Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, Kamins, Judge, and Jacquot, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Ivey, 342 Or App 649, 656-658, 577 P3d 884 (2025); State v. Parras, 326 Or App 246, 531 P3d 711 (2023), rev dismissed as improvidently allowed, 373 Or 284 (2025).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
346 Or. App. 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pace-orctapp-2026.