Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. P. R.

State v. P. R.

173 P.3d 1255, 216 Or. App. 451, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1709
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 5, 2007
Docket060868457; A133479
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 P.3d 1255 (State v. P. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. P. R., 173 P.3d 1255, 216 Or. App. 451, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1709 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is unable to provide for his basic needs because of his mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be. reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. PR
173 P.3d 1255 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 P.3d 1255, 216 Or. App. 451, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-p-r-orctapp-2007.