State v. P. R.
173 P.3d 1255, 216 Or. App. 451, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1709
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 5, 2007·No. 060868457; A133479·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is unable to provide for his basic needs because of his mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be. reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. P. R., 173 P.3d 1255, 216 Or. App. 451, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1709 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
173 P.3d 1255 (State v. P. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. PR
173 P.3d 1255 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)